Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8534 13
Original file (NR8534 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

JET
Docket No. NR8534-13
4 Mar 14

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 use 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, gitting in executive session, considered your
application on 4 March 2014. “Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the
advisory opinion furnished by CNPC Memo 1780 PERS-312 of ip

@ 2 copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In making this determination, the Board
substantially concurred with the comments contained in the
advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been
denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request. ,

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
‘that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission. of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
Docket No. NR&534-13

naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

| TRB *

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director

Enclosure: CNPC Memo 1780 PERS-312 of Qqyy?

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5412 14

    Original file (NR5412 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, ‘sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all naterial -submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1081 14

    Original file (NR1081 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNPC Memo 1780 PERS-312 of 2 Apr 14, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3292 14

    Original file (NR3292 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3936 14

    Original file (NR3936 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNPC memo 1780 PERS-312 of 12 Sep 14, a copy of which is attached. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3245 13

    Original file (NR3245 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on: 24 March 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by CNPC Memo 1780 PERS-314 of 19 Jun 13 and CNPC Memo 1780 PERS-314 of 31 Oct 13, a copies of which are attached, and were previously provided. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the _ existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2812-13

    Original file (NR2812-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 October 2013. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNPC Memo 1000 PERS-312/06 dtd 13 Jun 13, a copy of which is attached. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire | record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2400 13

    Original file (NR2400 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 December 2013. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1780 PERS-312 dated 1 September 2013, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8246 13

    Original file (NR8246 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 June 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1780 PERS-312 dated 17 January 2014, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3551 13

    Original file (NR3551 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 December 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board cqnsisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies, In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1780 PERS-312 dated 5 September 2013, a copy of which is attached. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR1498-13

    Original file (NR1498-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 September 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official Docket No.